This article studies the problem of structural deformations of property in post-privatization period, via the lack of public awareness ofthe property legitimacy that constantly produces utopian political slogans and public dissatisfaction with the current redistribution of property. Two completely opposite instruments of legitimization of property by means of nationalization and constitutional reform are examined. Conclusions are focused on the implementation of economic constitutionalism policy as a way of legitimizing the owner in Ukraine and building democratic and legal state. Emphasis is put on the confidence improvement of authority agents and counteract of the crisis of neoliberal capitalism, when rich people grow rich thanks to the poor segment of population as an essential mechanisms for public perception of property legalization and providing them with status quo. Legitimization of owner is objectively necessary condition for society reconstruction on the way of entrenchment of fundamental dominants of markets and civil society.
Keywords: legitimacy, property legalization of property, economic constitutionalism.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2015/167-2/16
References
1. Tetcher M. 2003. Iskusstvo upravleniya gosudarstvom. Strategii dlya menyayuschegosya mira. M. Alpina Pablisher.
2. Galchinskiy A. S. 2013. Zapiski sovetnika Prezidenta: desyat let s Prezidentom Leonidom Kuchmoy. K. Lyibid.
3. Oleynik A. 2004. “Institutsionalnyie lovushki” postprivatizatsionnogo perioda v Rossii. Voprosyi ekonomiki. # 6. p. 79-94.
4. ZhalIlo Ya. A. 2009. Teoriya ta praktika formuvannya efektivnoyi ekonomIchnoyi strategIyi derzhavi K. NISD.
5. Sotsiologichne opituvannya Available at http://www.razumkov.org.ua/ukr/poll.php?poll_id=238
6. Kapelyushnnkov R.I. 2008. Sobstvennost bez legitimnosti? M. GU VShE.
7. Zerkalo nedeli. 2005 9-15 apr.
8. Dementev V.V. 2008. Struktura ekonomIchnoyi vlady i povedinka vlasnika pidpriemstva. Ekonomichna teoriya. N2. p.22-37.
9. Radyigin A., Sidorov I. 2000. Rossiyskaya korporativnaya ekonomika: sto let odinochestva. Voprosyi ekonomiki # 5.p. 45-61.
10. Pustoviyt R. F. 2008. Problemi prav vlasnosti v transformatsIynih ekonomikah. Naukovi pratsi DonNTU Seriya ekonomichna. Vypusk 34.
11. Yavlinskiy G.A. 2007. Neobhodimost i sposoby legitimatsii krupnoy chastnoy sobstvennosti v Rossii postanovka problemy. Voprosyi ekonomiki. # 9 pp. 4-26.
12. Deforzh S.Yu. 2009. InstitutsIyni osnovy stanovlennya sotsialnogo rinkovogo gospodarstva: dis kand. ekon. Nauk 08.01.01 SergIy Yuriyovich Deforzh. S. 20.
13. Soto de. 2004. Zagadka kapitalszma. Pochemu kapitalizm torzhestvuet na Zapade i terpit porazhenie vo vsem ostalnom mire. 14. Maliy I. Y. 2011. TsivilizatsIyni zmIni ta diversifikatsiya institutsiynoyi roli derzhavy. Naukovi pratsi DonNTU Seriya, EkonoiIchna. 40-3. pp. 26-31.
15. Noviy kurs: reform v Ukrayini. 2010-2015. Natsionalna dopovid, Za zag. red. V.M. Geytsya , K. NVTs
NBUV. pp. 232. 16. Eschenko. P.S. 2011. Dogmy i realiyi “novoyi ekonomiky”. Teoretychni ta prikladni pitannya ekonomiki, 24.
17. Guriev S., Plehanov A., Sonin K. 2010. Ekonomicheskiy mehanizm syirevoy modeli razvitiya. Voprosyi ekonomiki # 3 pp. 4-23. 18. James M. Buchanan, 2004. “The Status of the Status Quo,” Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 133-144.
19. Ivashina O. F. 2010. Zahist prav vlasnosti ta kontraktiv: deyaki teoretichni aspekty. Formuvannya rynkovoyi ekonomiki zb. nauk. Prats, K. KNEU pp. 231–241.
20. Baranovskiy O., Sidenko V. 2004. Problemi vlasnosti ta legalizatsiyi kapitalu i dohodiv v Ukrayini. Natsionalna bezpeka i oborona #2, pp. 48.
21. Asoni, A., 2008. Protection of Property Rights and Growth As Political Equilibria. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(5), pp.953–987.
22. Buchanan, James M., Tullock, Gordon (1962). The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy Available at http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1063.
23. Zaostrovtsev A. P. 2011. Konstitutsionnaya politicheskaya ekonomiya: ideynyie istoki i ee mesto v sisteme ekonomicheskih ucheniy. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. # 3. pp. 35-42.
24. Ludwig, Van den Hauwe (1999). Public Choice, Constitutional Political Economy and Law and Economics.
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics., pp. 603-659.
25. Tkach A. 2013. Institutsionalnyie osnovyi ekonomicheskoy teorii prava. InstitutsIonalniy vektor ekonomIchnogo rozvytku: zbirnyk naukovyh prats MIDMU “KPU” 6 (2).
26. Byukenen Dzh. M. 1997. Sochineniya. Konstitutsiya ekonomicheskoy politiki. Nobelevskie laureatyi po ekonomike. T. 1 Fond ekonomicheskoy initsiativyi.
27. Kydland, F., and E. C. Prescott (1977). “Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans”. Journal of Political Economy, pp. 473–492.
28. Hayek F. 1990.Obschestvo svobodnyih. London рр. 309.
29. Ludwig, Van den Hauwe, 1999. “Public Choice, Constitutional Political Economy and Law and Economics”.
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics.
30. James M. Buchanan 1975. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, vol. 7 Available at http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1827
31. Buchanan, James M., 1990, ‘The Domain of Constitutional Economics’, Constitutional Political Economy, 1-18.
32. Malyiy I.Y. 2007. Institutsionalnyie deformatsii v transformatsionnoy ekonomike. NaukovI pratsi DonNTU Seriya: ekonomichna 31 1 (117). pp. 32-37.
33. Sonin K. 2011. Sonin.ru Uroki ekonomiki. M.: OOO “Yunayted Press”.
34. Keefer, P., Knack, S. (2002). Polarization, politics and property rights: Links between inequality and growth. Public Choice 111, 127–154.
35. Fukuyama Fr. 2004. Doverie: sotsialnyie dobrodeteli i put k protsvetaniyu. p. 730.
36. Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic pay off? A crosscountry investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1251–1288.
37.Ilchenko N.M. 2012. TransformatsIya sistemi derzhavnogo upravlInnya v Ukrayini: Institutsionalniy pidhid. Teoriya ta praktika derzhavnogo upravlinnya 4 (39).
