J. Nemec, prof. Ing., CSc., Professor, L. Matějová, Ing., Phd. student Masaryk University, Czech Republic DECENTRALISATION AND QUALITY OF GOVERNANCE: SELECTED ISSUES FROM THE CZECH AND SLOVAK REPUBLIC

Posted on by

Public administration reforms in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia started almost immediately after the “Velvet Revolution” in 1989. More than two decades of concrete experience with decentralisation in the specific environment of two selected transitional countries, now provides enough material for an attempt to assess the main pros, cons and risks of decentralisation as a public administration reform tool in these conditions. The goal of the paper is to discuss some important issues connected with processes of creation of modern governance in transitional countries, focusing mainly on decentralisation, its general problems and its specific limits in the environment of accession countries in Central Europe. Both Slovakia and the Czech Republic use decentralisation as the dominant tool to change their current public administrations. decentralisation might well be a good thing to achieve better governance in accession countries in Central Europe, but only under certain circumstances. Decentralisation alone does not bring positive results, automatically and immediately.

Keywords. Public administration, decentralization, governance, Czech Republic, Slovakia

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2014/155-2/5

References
  1. Allen, R., Tomassi, D., ed. Managing Public Expenditure. Paris: SIGMA OECD, 2001. – 501 p.
  2. Bailey, S. J. Public sector economics: theory, policy and practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995. – 406 p.
  3. Bailey, S. J. Local Government Economics: Principles and Practice. London: MacMillan, 1999. – 359 p.
  4. Bouckaert, G. Renewing Public Leadership: the Context for Service Delivery Reform. In: Delivering Public Services in CEE Countries: Trends and Developments. NISPAcee annual conference in Cracow, 2002. – 15-26 pp.
  5. Coombes, D., Verheijen, T., ed. Public Management Reform: Comparative Experiences from East and West. Bratislava: European Commission, 1997.
  6. Government of the Slovak republic. [online] Audit ustrednej statnej spravy SR. Bratislava: Urad vlady, 2000. [webpage]. – Access at: http://www.vlada.gov.sk/.
  7. Hamerníková, B., Kubátová, K. Verejne finance. Praha: Eurolex, 1999. – 355 p.
  8. Helikarová, K. Reforma verejne spravy v CR – rozpoctove aspekty. In: Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance. Conference proceedings on CR rom. Praha: VSE. 2002
  9. Hollý, T. (2002), Cesty k otvorenej statnej sprave. In: Verejna sprava, 2002. – Vol. 9. – P. 13-14.
  10. Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [online]. Důvěra ústavním institucím a spokojenost s politickou situací v březnu 2013. Praha, 2013. [web-page]. – Access at: http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/instituce-apolitici/duvera-ustavnim-institucim-a-spokojenost-s-politickou-situaci-v-breznu-2013.
  11. Kollar, M. (ed.). Slovensko 2001: súhrná správa o stave spoločnosti. Inštitút pre verejné otázky, 2002.
  12. Lane, J. E. New Public Management. London: Routledge, 2000. – 243 p.
  13. Merickova, B. Zabezpecovanie verejnych sluzieb verejnym a sukromnym sektorom. Banská Bystrica: EF UMB. 2002.
  14. Miller, V. L., Grodeland, A. B., Koschechkina, T. Y. Are the People Victims or Accomplices? Crime, Law and Social Change, 1998. – Vol.29. – No. 4. – P. 273-310.
  15. Nemec, J. Risks of outsourcing in Slovakia. In: World Bank Transitional Newsletter. 2001a. – Vol. 12. – No. 4 – P. 2-3.
  16. Nemec, J. Competitive contracting: Problems and potential in the public sector reform process in CEE. In: Government, Market and the Civic sector: The search for productive partnerships. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2001b. – P. 63-88.
  17. Nemec, J., Wright, G., ed. Public Finance: Theory and Practice in Central European Transition. Bratislava: NISPAcee. 1997.
  18. Nemec, J., Bercik, P., Kuklis, P. Local governments in Slovakia. In: Horvath, T.M., ed.: Decentralisation: Experiments and Reforms. Budapest: OSI/LGI, 2000. – P. 297-342.
  19. Nemec, J., Lawson, C. The Political Economy of Czech and Slovak Health Policy. In: International Political Science Review, 2003. – Vol.24. – No. 2. – P. 219 – 236.
  20. Nemec, J., Merickova, B., Naklady sa podozrivo rozchadzaju. Verejna sprava, 2004. – Vol. 3. – P. 22-23.
  21. Niskanen, W.A. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New York: Aldine, 1971. – 243 p.
  22. Niznansky, V. at all.[online] Strategia decentralizacie a reformy verejnej spravy. Bratislava: Urad vlady, 1999.. [webpage]. – Access at: http://www.vlada.gov.sk/.
  23. OECD. Control and Management Baselines for European Memberships. Paris: SIGMA OECD, 1999.
  24. Pollitt, Ch., Bouckaert, G. Public Management Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. – 347 p.
  25. Potucek, M., Radicova, I. Socialni politika v Cechach a na Slovensku po roce 1989. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, 1998.
  26. Rektorik, J., Selesovsky, J. Audit obci, ROPO a neziskovych organizaci. Brno: ESF MU, 1999.
  27. Spacek, D. E-Government – cíle, trendy a přístupy k jeho hodnocení. Praha: C.H. Beck, 2012. – 278 p.
  28. Spacek, D., Spalek, J. Communication and Electronic Public Administration: Some Issues in the Context of the Czech System of Public Administration. In Lessons and Recommendations for Improvement: Central and Eastern European Public Administration and Public Policy. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2007. – 217-238 p.
  29. Spacek, D. Reformy veřejné správy – globální trendy. In Veřejná správa v kontextu přípravy a vstupu státu do eurozony. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Ekonomicko-správní fakulta, 2009. – 8-23 p.
  30. Spacek, D., Maly, I. Shrnutí institucionální reformy veřejné správy. In Veřejná správa v kontextu přípravy a vstupu státu do eurozóny. Brno: Ekonomicko-správní fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, 2009. – 72-90 p.
  31. Stiglitz, J. E. Economics of the Public Sector. New York: Norton, 1989. – 658 p.
  32. Strecková, Y. Strategie reformy verejné spravy. In: Verejna ekonomie a sprava. VSB-TU Ostrava, 1999. – 10-18 p.
  33. Streckova, Y. et.all., Zprava o prubehu reformy uzemni verejne správy. In: Verejna sprava, 2001. – Vol. 34. – P. 12-18.
  34. Swianiewicz, P., ed. Public Perception of Local Governments. Budapest: OSI/LGI. 2001.
  35. Transparency International Slovakia. Pod lupou. Bratislava: CPHR-TIS. 2002.
  36. Vitek, L., Pubal, K. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Tax Collection – the Case of the Czech Central and Local Governments. In: Delivering Public Services in CEE Countries: Trends and Developments. NISPAcee, 2002. 64 – 77 p.
  37. Westerwelt, H.V. Minimum Size of Municipalities. Paper presented at Colloquium on Size of Municipalities in Budapest, 1994.
  38. Zemanovicova, D., ed. A bude svetlo. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovakia, 2001.

Download