In the articles considered pressing questions of development of strategic partnership are taking into account priorities of ecological security that appears qualificatory and integrating for the countries of the world at the terms of display of calls and threats of globalization. The expediency of forming a joint environmental responsibility and market pragmatism in foreign policy of the countries of the world. Defined trends of strengthening ecological conflicts in the regions of the world because of the acute shortage of natural and energy resources, disproportions in distribution and irrational consumption. It is proved that the capacity for sustained leadership will be the countries who will testify capacity up to new forms of strategic partnership on the principles of ecological security, economic decisions considering interests and competitive aspirations for joint protection of the future of mankind. It is vitally necessary given the complexity of the influence of the parameters of the international system of ecological security in the economic, political and social transformation in society.

Keywords: globalization, economic space, ecological security, ecological responsibility, strategic partnership, geopolitical configuration.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2014/160-7/1

References

1. Horbulin V.P. Stratehichne planuvannya: vyrishennya problem natsional’noyi bezpeky: monohrafiya / V.P. Horbulin, A.B. Kachyns’kyy. – K.: NISD, 2010. – 288 s.
2. Kosolapov N. Bezopasnost mezhdunarodnaia, natsionalnaia, hlobalnaia: vzaimodopolniaemost іlі protivorechivost / N. Kosolapov //Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. – 2006. – № 9. – P. 3-13.
3. Kulagin V. Globalnaia i mirivaia bezopasnost’ / V. Kulagin // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy – 2007. – №2. – S. 38-51.
4. Mizhnarodne bezpekove seredovyshche: vyklyky i zahrozy natsional’niy bezpetsi Ukrayiny. /Parakhons’kyy B.O., Yavors’ka H.M., Reznikova O.A.; za zah. red. K.A. Kononenka – K.: NISD, 2013. – 64 s.
5. Asymetriya mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn / za red. H.M. Perepelytsi, O.M. Subtel’noho. – K.: Vyd. dim “Stylos”, 2005. – 555 s.
6. Efremenko D. Vliianie krupnogo biznesa na teoriiu i praktiku global’noi’ e’kolohycheskoi’ politiki /D. Efremenko // Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. – 2008. – № 11. – P. 61-68.
7. Kostin V.I. E’kopolitologiia i globalistika: Uchebnoe posobie / A.I. Kostin. – M.: Aspekt Press, 2005. – P. 141-142.
8. Piskulova N. Razvitie mirovoi e’konomiki: e’kologicheskii’ vektor N. Piskulova // Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia.– 2010. – № 12. – P. 28-37.
9. “The Partnership Principle. New Forms of Governance in the 21st Century”. Alfred Herrhausen Society for International Dialogue. Archetype Publications. London. 2005.
10. Internet-resource. Access mode: http://www.iiss.org.
11. Kissinger Henry A. The chance for a new world order / Kissinger Henry A. // The International Herald Tribune. – 2009. – January 12. – Р. 12-14.
12. Rifkin D. Esli nefti bol’she net… Kto vozglavit mirovuiu e’nergeticheskuiu revoliutsyiu? /Dzh. Ryfkin; per. s angl. M. Shternhartsa. – M.: YD “Sekret firmy”, 2006. – 416 s.
13. Earth in the balance. Ecology and the Human Spirit / A. Hor, pereklad z anhl.: VHO “Ukrayina. Poryadok dennyy na ХХІ stolittya” ta Instytut staloho rozvytku. – K.: Intelsfera, 2001. – S. 240.
14. Internet-resource. Access mode: http://www.rolandberger.com/news.
15. Herasymchuk V. Stratehichne partnerstvo: pryntsypy, instrumentariy, efektyvnist’ / V. Herasymchuk / Internetresource. Access mode: http://economy.kpi.ua.
16. Ukraina perevykonala vymogy Kiots’kogo protokolu shchodo vykydiv vugletsevogo hazu Internet-resource. Access mode: http://tyzhden.ua