V. Trokhymenko, PhD in Economics, Assistant Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine ESSENTIAL PRACTICE OF SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT BANKS REGULATION

Posted on by

The paper analyzes specific features of establishment of new regulatory standards of systemically important banks as one of the most priority directions of post-crisis improvement of supranational financial regulation. The essense of active and prearranged initiatives to secure constant activity of global and domestic powerful super-big banking institutions is investigated as well as some approaches as to recovery measures implementation without involvement of taxpayers’ funds in case of their financial failure are considered. In particular, the main points are focused on introduction of additional requirements to the sufficiency of capital of global systemically important banks, development of the regulatory mechanisms of domestic systemically important banks by domestic authorities taking into account the specific peculiarities of certain national economies, structural reforms as to separation of traditional banking from the securities transactions for the depositors protection (Volcker rule, USA; Vickers rule, UK), establishment of the Single Supervisory Mechanism for the Eurozone banks, and declaration of necessity to form the Single mechanism for bank bankruptcy resolution etc. Some proposals concerning transformation of domestic system of financial regulation and supervision in Ukraine, like strengthening control of systemically important banks activity and introduction of mega-regulator model are characterized.

Keywords: systemically important financial institutions; global systemically important banks; domestic systemically important banks; supranational level of financial regulation and supervision.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2014/164-11/11

References
  1. Bazylevych, V.D (2013), “Modern economic theory: searching a new paradigm”, Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, vol. 4(145), pp. 5 – 7.
  2. James R. Barth, Apanard (Penny) Prabha, and Phillip Swagel, Just How Big Is the Too Big to Fail Problem? 27 March, 2012.
  3. SNL, Largest 100 banks in the world, available at: http://www.snl.com/InteractiveX/article.aspx?cdid=A-26316576- 11566&TabStates=0
  4. World Bank, Gross Domestic Product, 7 May 2014, available at: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf
  5. George G. Kaufman, “Too Big to Fail in Banking: What Does It mean?”, LSE Financial Markets Group Special Paper Series, June 2013.
  6. Trokhymenko, V. (2014), “Too Big to Fail Banks: Causes, Contradictions and Consequences”, Revista Economica, vol. 66, pp. 127 – 140.
  7. Financial Stability Board, Progress and Next Steps Towards Ending “Too-Big-To-Fail” (TBTF), Report of the Financial Stability Board to the G20, 2 September 2013 available at: http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/ publications/r_130902.pdf
  8. Financial Stability Board, Reducing the moral hazard posed by systemically important financial institutions, FSB Recommendations and Time Lines, 20 October 2010, available at: http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/ publications/r_101111a.pdf
  9. Financial Stability Board, 2013 update of group of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), 11 November, 2013, available at: http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_131111.pdf
  10. Deloitte, EMEA Centre for Regulatory Strategy (2013), Addressing the risks posed by systemicslly important banks. The end of too big to fail?, available at: http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedKingdom/Local%20Assets/ Documents/Industries/Financial%20Services/uk-fs-addressing-the-risks-posed-print.pdf
  11. Central bank of the Russian Federation (2014), Review of the Financial Stability Board activities. July 2014, available at: http://www.cbr.ru/analytics/fin_stab/OMSFR_2014-07.pdf
  12. Hudjakova, L.S. and Sidorova, E.A. (2014), “Reform of regulation of financial sector in European Union”, Den’gi i kredit, vol. 4, pp. 28–34.
  13. European Commission,Towards a banking union, Brussels, 10 September 2012, available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-656_en.htm
  14. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2001), The Law of Ukraine “On banks and banking”, available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2121-14 (Accessed September 2014).
  15. National Bank of Ukraine (2004), The resolution “On approval of the Principle on providing of continuous functioning of information systems of the National Bank of Ukraine and banks of Ukraine”, available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0857-04 (Accessed September 2014).
  16. National Bank of Ukraine (2014), “Data from the financial statements of the Ukrainian banks”, available at: http://bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=36807&cat_id=36798 (September 2014).
  17. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2014), The Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on prevention of negative consequences for the stability of the banking system”, available at: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1586-18 (September 2014).
  18. Kornyliuk, R. (2014), “Top 10 reforms of the banking system by 2020”, available at: http://bankografo.com/reformibankivskoyi-sistemi-ochima-kliyentiv.html
  19. Hrazhevs’ka, N.I. and Trokhymenko, V.I., (2013), “The institutional change in the world economy under financial globalization”, Finansy UKrainy, vol.5, pp. 58 – 68. 20. Dzyun’, O.B. (2014), “World Experience of creating a mega-regulator for the finsncial services market”, available at: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=695
  20. NBU hoche staty’ megaregulyatorom finansovogo rynku (2014), available at: http://info.oberig.com.ua/2014/06/нбу- хоче-стати-мегарегулятором-фінан/
  21. Finansovyi rynok Ukrayiny: v ochikuvanni shtormu (2014), available at: http://s.pro-capital.ua/ua/news/novostirynka/fіnansovij-rinok-ukraїni-v-ochіkuvannі-shtormu/

Download