Abstract. Currently world faces the dilemma – ecological economy or economic(al) ecology. The researchers produce hundreds of surveys on the topic. However the analyses of recent most cited simulations had shown the diversity of results. Thus, for some states the Kuznets environmental curve has place, for others – no. Same could be said about different years for the same state. It provokes the necessity of drawing new group analyses to reveal the tendencies and relationships between economic and environmental factors. Most flexible and mirror factor of environmental sustainability is the volume of CO2 emissions. The econometric analysis was used for detecting the economic impact on this indicator at the global level and in the spectra of group of states depending on their income. The hypothesis of the existence of environmental Kuznets curve for the analysed data is rejected. Real GDP per capita impact on carbon dioxide emissions is considered only at the global level. The impact of openness of the economy is weak. Rejection happened also to the hypothesis that for the developed countries there is a reverse dependence between the environmental pollution and economic openness. Indicator “energy consumption per capita” impacts on greenhouse gas emissions only in countries with high income. Whereby it should be noted that the more developed a country is, the more elastic is this influence. These results have a potential usage for environmental policy regulation and climate strategy.
Keywords: ecological economy, econometric modeling, environment, income, CO2 emission.
1. Bartz S. (2004) Economic Growth and the Environment: Theory and Facts. Department of Economics, University of Miami, pp. 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.06.001
2. Carson R. T. (2010) The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Vol. 4, Issue 1(winter), pp. 3–23. doi:10.1093/reep/rep021
3. Halicioglu F. (2008) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. MPRA Paper, Access mode: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11457/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012
4. Hossain S. (2012) An Econometric Analysis for CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Foreign Trade and Urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Economy, 3, pp. 92-105 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/lce.2012.323013
5. Hryhorkiv V. (2009) Dynamichni modeli optymal”noyi struktury vyrobnyctva v ekolohichno zbalansovanij ekonomici. http://arr.chnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/709
6. Kharlamova, G., Nesterenko, V. (2014) Environmental Safety And Economic Development Of Ukraine: Impact Assessment. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics., 155, pp. 19-26 http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2014/155-2/4
7. Kharlamova G. (2007) Modeling the Best Use of Investments for Minimizing Risks of Multiple Stressors on the Environment. Multiple Stressors: A Challenge for the Future. Edited by C. Mothersill, I. Mosse and C. Seymour, The Netherlands: Springer, Chapter 33, pp. 441-448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6335-0_33
8. Konchak W., Pascual U. (2006) Converging economic paradigms for a constructive environmental policy discourse. Environmental science & policy, 9, pp. 10-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.004
9. Leont’ev V., Ford D. (1972) Mezhotraslevoj analiz vlijanija struktury jekonomiki na okruzhajushhuju sredu. Jekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 3, pp. 370-400.
10. Levinson A. (2004) Unmasking the pollution haven effect, NBER Working Paper. Access mode: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10629. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10629
11. Mikrjukova M. J. (2004) Institucional’nye problemy jekologizacii razvitija mezojekonommicheskoj sistemy. Jekonomika prirodopol’zovanija, UJekS, 4(24). Available at: http://www.uecs.ru/ekonomika-prirodopolzovaniyz/item/225-2011-03-24-11-50-39
12. Omay R. (2013) The Relationship between Environment and Income: Regression Spline Approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Vol. 3, pp. 52-61.
13. Tamazian A. et al. (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37, pp. 246-253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025
14. World development indicators (WDI). World DataBank. Access mode: http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/home.do.