Finance for the social sphere remains a great challenge in modern economy. The necessity of adequate living standards under limited resources raises a complicated problem for governments to provide appropriate distributing mechanism among the most vulnerable sections of the population. The paper analysed the concept of absolute basic income, which in some EU countries is considered as a substitution for a modern system of social security.

Inequality of incomes creates not only a social problem but it is also an obstacle in the way of economic growth. It leads to the conclusion that government should provide some strategy to avoid high inequality. The model of rational individual with certain basic income is under investigation. The analysis of the model suggests that the presence of additional income not only facilitates more effective involvement of individuals to work, but it is a sort of indisputable factor for guaranteeing freedom of individuals and increasing their mutual respect. Thus, the idea of basic income, which spreads among European countries, has not only economic, but also political and psychological components that may affect the mentality of people in future.

It is demonstrated that the transition to a new social security schemes in Ukraine can accumulate from 856 to 1020 bln. UAH in 2015 prices. It can provide guaranteed monthly payments from 1928 to 2297 UAH per capita and from 482 to 574 USD per child without changing the structure of the budget in case of replacement minimum pensions, minimum wages and full monetization of privileges. Obviously, such strategy not only would improve the efficiency of budget spending, but also produce a multiplier effect on the economy by changing and optimizing the consumption patterns of the population, increasing the competition in all markets for a real consumer. It has a chance of reducing the struggle to obtain state funds through tenders. However, the transition to the new system can be implemented only after reforms in health, education, judicial systems, monetization of most privileges.

Keywords: individual, basic income, rationality, social economics, salary, motivation.

Date of submission 24.12.2015

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2016/178-1/5

References

1. Richard Samans, Jennifer Blanke, Gemma Corrigan, Margareta Drzeniek, 2015.The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2015. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth.pdf
2. OECD (20l6), Income inequality (indicator). doi: 10.1787/459aa7f1-en (Accessed on 28 March 2016)
3. Andrew G. Berg and Jonathan D. Ostry, 2011. Inequality and Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin? International Monetary Fund, Research Department. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781463926564.006 Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2011/sdn1108.pdf
4. Jonathan D. Ostry, Andrew Berg, Charalambos G. Tsangarides, 2014.Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth. International Monetary Fund, Research Department. April, 2014.
5. Rahul Anand, Volodymyr Tulin, Naresh Kumar, 2014. India: Defining and Explaining Inclusive Growth and Poverty Reduction. IMF Working Paper, Asia and Pacific Department. April 2014.
6. Imf Policy Paper: Fiscal Policy And Income Inequality.Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2014/012314.pdf
7. Basic Income Grant Pilot Project. Assessment Report, April 2009.- Available at: http://www.bignam.org/Publications/pdf
8. Bakaev O.O., Karagodova O.O., Kutah Y.O., 2004. Foundations of microeconomics: Teaching Manual. Kyiv, 2004. 267 p.
9. Consolidated budget of Ukraine, Available at: http://www.bank.gov.ua/doccatalog/document?id=23473384
10. Report on the implementation of the budget for 2014.Pension Fund of Ukraine. Available at:http://www.pfu.gov.ua/pfu/doccatalog/document?id=227018/li>
11. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available at: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/