M. Malik, Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, H. Hudz, PhD Student Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine THE RISK OF GENE TRANSFERRING IN THE INSURANCE PROTECTION OF AGRICULTERE

The paper justified essence of genetic engineering as the object of insurance services. Defines the concept of risk gene transferring. The character features of this specific risk. The influence and consequences for agricultural producers. The description of the possible creation of the concept of insurance services that cover risk of gene transferring.

The study reveals of the use of GMOs in agriculture, due to issues of economic security of a particular region or country as a whole.

To determined the impact of risks and control for developing and developed countries that are important aspects of farming. Changes in weather, climate, productivity, price values, public policy, the situation on global markets can cause large fluctuations in agricultural production, and consequently affecting the income of agricultural producers. Risk management includes a range of strategies that reduce the social and financial implications of possible changes affecting the production and income of farmers.

There is a need for an in-depth study of the theoretical and practical aspects of the impact of the risk of gene transferring in the context of insurance protection.

Keywords: genetic engineering, agricultural entrepreneurship, risk of gene transferring, transgenic crops, the insurance protection.

Date of submission 21.02.2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2016/180-3/2


  1. Balasynovych, B. and Yaroshevs’ka, Yu. “GMO: challenges and experience of legal regulation”, HMO: vyklyky s’ohodennya ta dosvid pravovoho rehulyuvannya. Instytut ekonomichnykh doslidzhen’ ta politychnykh konsul’tatsiy, available at: http://www.ier.com.ua
  2. Lobova, O.M. (2014), “The risk insurance efficiency of business activity in the agricultural sector”. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, № 156, pp. 70 – 76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728- 2667.2014/156-3/14
  3. Prykaziuk, N.V. (2012), “Developing of world insurance in post-crisis period”. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, № 135, pp. 22 – 25. DOI: 10.17721
  4. Sholoiko, A. (2013), “World experience state support of agriculture through insurance programs”. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, № 135, pp. 41 – 43. DOI: 10.17721
  5. Philip Regal: A Brief History of Biotechnology Risk Debates and Policies in the United States, available at: http://www.edmonds-institute.org/regal.html
  6. Glick B. R., Pasternak J. J. Molecular Biotechnology. Principles and Applications of Recombinant DNA. Washington, D.C.: ASM PRESS, 1998. 589 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-4487
  7. Hoffmann-Sommergruber K. Patogenes-related (RP) -proteins identi.ied as allergens // Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2002. Vol. 30. P. 930-935. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bst0300930
  8. Beckie, H.J.; Hall, L.M.; Warwick, S.I. Impact of herbicide-resistant crops as weeds in Canada. Proceedings Brighton Crop Protection Council – Weeds. 2001. P. 135-142. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/p05-193
  9. Bernstain, I.L.; Bernstein, J.L.; Miller, M.; Tierzieva, S.; Bernstein, D.L.; Lummus, Z.; Selgrade, M.K.; Doer .ler, D.L.; Seligy, V.L. Immune responses in farm workers after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis pesticides // Environ. Helth Perspect. 1999. V. 107. P. 575-582. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.99107575
  10. Hardell L., Eriksson M. A case-control study of non-hodgkin lymphoma and exposure to pesticides // Cancer. 1999. Vol. 85, № 6. P. 1353-1360. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990315)85:6
  11. Muller B.P., Zumdick A., Schuphan I., Schmidt B. Metabolism of the herbicide glufosinate-ammonium in plant cell cultures of transgenic (rhizomania-resistant) and non-transgenic sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris), carrot (Daucus carota), purple foxglove (Digitalis purpurea) and thorn apple (Datura stramonium) // Pest. Manag. Sci. 2001. Vol. 57, № 1. P. 46-56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1526-4998(200101 )57:1
  12. Genetic Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, available at: http://www.bvl.bund.de/EN/06_Genetic_Engineering/genetic_engineering_node.html
  13. The Cartagena Protocol. Convention on Biological Diversity, available at: http://bch.cbd.int/protocol/text/
  14. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Regulation, Derectives and other acts, available at: http://europa.eu/eu-law/decision-making/legal-acts/index_en.htm
  15. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Regulation, Derectives and other acts, available at: http://europa.eu/eu-law/decision-making/legal-acts/index_en.htm
  16. Climate Change Global Food Security. United States Department of Agriculture, available at: http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome
  17. USDA Advisory Committee on Biotechnology and 21st Century Agriculture (AC21). Enhancing Coexistence: A Report of the AC21 to the Secretary of Agriculture, available at: http://www.usda.gov/documents/ac21_report-enhancing- coexistence.pdf
  18. Goldberg R. The Genetic Revolution: Transforming our Industry // Address to the International Food and Agribusiness Management Association. Chicago, 26 June 2000.
  19. Koch B. (ed.). Liability and Compensation Schemes for Damage Resulting from the Presence of Genetically Modified Organisms in Non-GM Crops // Reports (EU). European Centre of Tort and Insurance Law. April 2007.