S. Yakubovskiy, Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, A. Briatko, PhD Student I.I. Mechnikov Odessa National University, Odessa, Ukraine THE MODEL OF SUSTAINABLE GROWTH: KEY INDICATORS AND IMPLIMENTATION IN UKRAINE

The key components of government system based on the principle of sustainable growth of the national economy are analyzed. Basic indicators for successful implementation of this model are determined. The most effective measures for crisis management and creating of foundations for sustainable economic growth in Ukraine are defined.

Keywords: global financial crisis, crisis management, model of sustainable growth.

Date of submission 22.10.16

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2016/188-11/1

References

  1. Golub J. (2008) The Study of Decision-Making Speed in the European Union Methods, Data and Theory, European Union Politics, Volume 9 (1), pp. 167-179.
  2. Mazur B. (2010) Cultural Diversity in Organizational Theory and Practice, Bialystok Technical University, Journal of Intercultural Management, Volume 2 (2), pp. 5-15.
  3. Chalekian P. (2013) POSDCORB: Core Patterns of Administration, MD, USA: PLoP, 20 p.
  4. Karpova V. (2010) National idea of modern Ukraine: problems and prospects of foundation, Bulletin of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, № 3, pp. 21-29.
  5. Chupriy L. (2012) National idea as a factor in the consolidation of Ukrainian political nation, Scientific notes of the
  6. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies, Volume 2, pp. 230-244.
  7. Tolbert P. and Zucker L. (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, Administrative Science Quarterly, № 28, pp. 20-39.
  8. Law of Ukraine “On the state service”, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, law № 889 – VIII, 10.12.2015, available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/889-19
  9. Sharma M. and Jain S. (2013) Leadership Management: Principles, Models and Theories, Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, Volume 3 (3), pp. 309-318.
  10. Isac C., Voichi{a L., Gu[a A. (2009) Coordination of management activities – a condition sine qua non of a performance management, Annals of the University of Petrosani. Economics, Volume 9 (3), pp. 335-340.
  11. Eaton K., Kaiser K., Smoke P. (2010) The political economy of decentralization reforms: implications for aid effectiveness, Washington, D.C., USA: The World Bank, 92 p.
  12. Castelli J. (2007) Government Public Relations: A Quantitative Assessment of Government Public Relations Practitioner Roles and Public Relations Model Usage, FL, USA: University of South Florida, 120p.
  13. Briatko A.A. (2014) Research methodology of financial and economic oscillations: general characteristics and vision features of certain scientists, Bulletin of the I.I. Mechnikov Odessa National University. Economics, Volume 19 (3), pp.212-218.
  14. Cheberyako O., Ryabokon O. (2016) Local budgets under current decentralization: Ukraine and foreign experience, Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, № 4 (181), pp .24-29, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2016/181-4/4
  15. Briatko A.A. (2016) Anti-crisis policy of the European post-soviet countries: common characteristics and national features, Bulletin of the Mariupol State University. Economics, Volume 11, pp.92-102.
  16. Briatko A.A. (2016) World financial and economic crisis and BRIKS countries reaction on it, Bulletin of the V.O. Sukhomlinskiy National University. Economics, № 1 (6), pp.74-87.

Download

  • pdf 188_6-10
    File size: 320 kB Downloads: 102