R. Holly, Professor, Dr. Hab., E. Greszta, Doctoral student The Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Socio-Economics Policy, Warsaw, Poland CAPTIVE AS AN INSURANCE FORMULA FOR RISK MANAGEMENT: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

This article introduces subject of an insurance captive entity, with focus on how it could be used as insurance formula for risk management. Captive might be the most appropriate insurance formula for risk management. However, the level of achieved success depends on many factors.Insurance captivesare understood as entities which are formed and owned by companies mostly for the purpose of insuring own risks (pure captive or single parent captive). More and more often captives are also formed by a group of companies (group captives) to insure their properties and liabilities towards 3rd parties. Captives are widely used by many companies nowadays. However, many of them,are used solely for a purpose of a risk cession and premium trans¬fer, with an intention to use captivesmore as a profit center in a low taxation country rather than for the purpose of risk management (i.e. a more appropriate role for captive would be to support their owners in enterprise risk management – ERM).
This article touches on why captives are not used to their full potential. It may be toochallenging for many decision makers to embrace on captives as risk management formula and extend captives’ roles to utilize all possible advantages resulting from owning a captive.
Captive can deliver risk management in a more comprehensive way than most commercial insurers on the market. The article also presents advantages and disadvantages of owning an insurance captive.

Key words: captive insurance company, group captive, captive domicile, risk, risk management.

Date of submission 21.01.2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2017/191-2/2


  1. OECD (2015). Glossary of tax terms, http://www.oecd.org/ctp/glossaryoftaxterms.htm#c [Accessed on 8 December 2016]
  2. Stickney W. (2014). At Your Own Risk, Warren B. Stickney, Middletown, p. 15
  3. Holly R. (2013). Zarzqdzanie ryzykiem – czyli czym?, available at: http://cyfroteka.pl/catalog/ebooki/02014003/020/ff/101/OEBPS/Text/section004-001.xhtml [Accessed on 8 December 2016]
  4. Walker R. (2013). Winning with Risk Management, World Scientific, Singapore
  5. Protifiti Risk Consulting (2006). Guide to Enterprise Risk Management, available at: http://www.ucop.edu/enterprise- risk-management/_files/protiviti_faqguide.pdf [Accessed 15 December 2016]
  6. Bawcutt (1997). Captive Insurance Companies, 4th Edition, London
  7. Aon Risk Consulting (2015). Global Risk Management Survey, available at: http://www.aon.com/2015GlobalRisk/attachments/2015-Global-Risk-Management-Report-230415.pdf [Accessed on 15 December 2016]
  8. Spring (2016). 12 Helpful Captive Insurance Statistics and Facts, available at: http://www.springgroup.com/12-helpful-captive-insurance-statistics-and-facts/ p. 5 [Accessed on 15 December 2016]
  9. Business insurance (2015). Available at: https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20150315/NEWS06/150409887 [Accessed on Dec 15th, 2016]
  10. Aon Risk Consulting (2015) Global Risk Management Survey, available at: http://www.aon.com/2015GlobalRisk/attachments/2015-Global-Risk-Management-Report-230415.pdf[Accessed on 15.12.2016]
  11. Heritage (2013). An Introduction to Captive Insurance Companies, available at: http://www.polrisk.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Introduction-to-Captives.pdf [Accessed on 30.12.2016]
  12. The National Law Review (2016). Captive Insurance Litigation: Key 2014 Cases, available at: http://www.natlawreview.com/article/captive-insurance-litigation-key-2014-cases[Accessed on 30.12.2016]


  • pdf 191_17-22
    File size: 291 kB Downloads: 1068