N. Prykaziuk, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine COMPARATIVISM OF DEFINITIONS “SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT” AND “SYSTEMATIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS”

A comparative analysis of the definitions of “systemically important”, “systemically significant”, “systematic financial institutions” was conducted, and the correlation between definitions was established in the article. It was discovered that the definition “systemically important financial institution” is the broadest among those which were investigated, since it was substantiated that not only institutions that are considered large according to their size or volume of transactions, but also those institutions which are of an average or even small size but which are characterized by the presence of a large number of similar financial institutions can be related to the financial institutions that meet the main features of the systemically important institutions.

It was determined that the ability to influence the financial system, and the entire economy through financial system is the main feature which determines an institution as a “systemically important financial institution”. Systemically important financial institutions can be allocated both at the national and global levels. At the same time, the latter can carry systemic risks and affect not only the national but also the global financial system, the difficulties of their activities can be reflected in the situation of the economy of some countries as well as the aggregate of countries;

It was investigated that systemically important financial institutions are those institutions that can potentially carry systemic risks and negatively affect the financial system that in its turn affects the economy as a whole, and that have at least one additional feature related to their large size (capital / assets / the market share / volumes and the complexity of the operations they carry out / the presence of an extensive system of branches and subsidiaries), systematic, the presence of a large number of similar financial institutions or the difficulty (complexity) of their substitution;

It was substantiated that systematic financial institutions are those financial institutions, which according to the parameters of the size, the structure and the volume of transactions carried out by them act as an important part of the financial system and taking into account the scale of their activity, can potentially influence it.

Keywords: financial system, systemically important financial institutions, systemically significant financial institutions, system-building financial institutions, systemic risk.

Date of submission 13.07.2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2017/194-5/3


  1. Bernanke, Ben S., 2009. Financial reform to address systemic risk. Speech at the Council on Foreigh Relations, Washington DC, USA. Available at: http://www.federalreserve.gv/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090310a.htm.
  2. Acharya, V., 2006. Too many to Fail – An Analysis of Time-inconsistency in Bank Closure Policies. [pdf] Bank of England: Working Paper, 319, pp. 42. Available at: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~sternfin/vacharya/public_html/acharya_yorulmazer_bank_closures.pdf
  3. Lavrenyuk, V.V., 2014. Ontology of Nature and the Essence of Systemically Important Banks. Biznes inform, 5, pp. 363-369.
  4. Rajan, E., 2009. Too Systemic to fail: Conserquences? Causes? And Potential Remedies. [pdf] Senate Banking Committee Hearings, pp. 8. Available at: http://www.bis.org/events/conf090625/rajanpaper1 .pdf
  5. Krasnova, I., 2015. The essence and criteria for identifying systemically important banks. Bulletin of the National Bank of Ukraine, 5, pp. 18-24.
  6. Praet, P., 2010. Macro-prudent and financial stability statistics to improve financial analysis of exposures and risk transfers. Fifth ECB Conference of Statistics “Central Bank statistics: What did financial crisis change”. pp. 3.
  7. Zhou, C., 2010. Are Banks Too Big to Fail? Measuring Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions. International Journal of Central Banking, pp. 205-250.
  8. Huertas Thomas, F., 2009. Too big to fail, too complex to contemplate: What to do about systemically important firms: manuscript. [pdf] Financial Markets Group Conference: London School of Economics and Political Science. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/fmg/documents/events/ conferences/2009/tooBig/Huertas.pdf
  9. Hee Su, Roh, 2015. Too-Important-To-Fail (TITF) Implicit Guarantee with a Limited Fiscal Backstop May. Social Science Research Network, pp. 46. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cgm?abstract_id=2614258
  10. Yaseen, A., 2012. Managing Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs). Speech at the second meeting of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Regional Consultative Group for Asia. Kuala Lumpur.
  11. Pashkevich, A., 2013. Systemically significant financial institutions on the example of the banks of Belarus. Bankovskiy vesnik: Informational, analytical and scientific and practical journal of the National Bank of the Republic of Belarus, 19, pp. 27-36.
  12. Zhegalova, E.V., 2015. The development of regulation and supervision in the global insurance market in the context of globalization: foreign and Russian experience. Economic sciences, 131, pp. 113-116.
  13. Khudyakova, L.S., 2013. New approaches to global financial regulation. IMEMO RAS, Moscow, pp. 162.
  14. Novikova, V., 2013. Functioning and Regulation of Systemically Significant Banks in the Republic of Belarus. Bankovskiy vesnik: Informational, Analytical and Scientific and Practical Journal of the National Bank of the Republic of Belarus, 20, pp. 33-38.
  15. Jagitian, E.P., 2012. Influence Volcker’s Directive on Mergers and Acquisitions of US Financial Institutions. Money and credit, 11, pp. 46-52.
  16. Silvestrov, S.N., 2014. The Financial Stability Board as the fourth pillar of the global financial system. Bulletin of the Financial University, 6, pp. 84-91.
  17. ECB, 2006. Financial Stability Report. [pdf] European Central Bank. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/financialstabilityreview200612en.pdf?eeb9342332f4cd3127e55b523c51c9ff
  18. ECB, Financial Stability Review. [pdf] European  Central    Bank., pp.  18.  Available    at: https://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/financialstabilityreview200612en.pdf
  19. BIS, 2011. Global systemically important banks: assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement (Covernote). [pdf] Basel Committee of Banking Supervision. Available at: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs207cn.pdf
  20. CIS, 2015. Regulation of the activities of key financial institutions of CIS member states taking into account international practice. CIS Executive Committee. e-cis.info/foto/pages/24801.docx
  21. Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine 139 of 9 April 2012 on the Procedure for the Identification and Recognition of Banking Groups. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0708-12
  22. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2013. Globally systemically important banks: updated assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement. [pdf] Bank for International Settlements. Available at: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs255.pdf
  23. PBC, Members of Financial Stability Analysis Group of PbC. [pdf] People’s bank of China. Available at: http://www.pbc.gov.cn/english/130736/2946072/2015090616281480816.pdf
  24. Department of Finance, 2014. Minister of Finance about the importance of ensuring Canada’s financial system remains strong. Ontario: Ottawa. Available at: http://www.fin.gc.ca/n14/14-099-eng.asp.
  25. Banks and Banking Act 2000. Ukraine: Verkhovna Rada. Available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2121-14
  26. Katusov, V.Yu, 2015. Money Credit. Banks: a textbook for bachelors. Moscow: Publishing House Yurayt, pp. 507.
  27. Kaufman, G.G., 2013. Too Big to Fail in Banking: What Does It mean. [pdf] LSE financial Markets Group special paper series. Available at: <http://www.lse.ac.uk/fmg/workingpapers/specialpapers/pdf/sp222.pdf
  28. Nier, E.W., 2011. Towards Effective Macroprudential Policy Frameworks: An Assessment of Stylized Institutional Models. [pdf] IMF Working Papers. Available at: <https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp11250.pdf
  29. Craig, O. Brown, 2009. Too Many To Fail? Evidence of Regulatory Forbearance When the Banking Sector is Weak. [pdf] Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=
  30. League of insurance organizations of Ukraine, 2011. Expert opinion on Ukrainian insurance companies account for over 75% of the retail market. League of insurance organizations of Ukraine. Available at: http://uainsur.com/our-news/28933/