V. Smiesova, ORCID iD 0000-0002-0444-4659, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine TYPOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS OF ACTORS

Posted on by

A typology of reproduction of the economic interests of actors is proposed in accordance with quantitative and qualitative changes in the results of their implementation, as well as in accordance with the propensity of economic behavior of actors to stability (stability) and dynamism (variability) in the process of actualization of economic interests. Systemic interrelations and interdependencies between the proposed types of reproduction of economic interests are justified. The mutual influence of the reproduction of the economic interests of actors and the institutional environment is revealed.

Keywords: reproduction; institutes; interest; economic interests; economic behavior

Received: 06/11/2017

1st Revision: 22/12/2017

Accepted: 15/01/2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2018/197-2/7

References

  1. Kaneman D., Tverski A., 2003. Ratsionalnyy vybor, tsennosti i freymy. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, Vol. 24, №4:31-42
  2. Tversky A., 2004. Preference, belief, and similarity: Selected writings. Massachusets Institute of Technology, 1023.
  3. Diton A., 2016. Velikij pobeg: Zdorov’e, bogatstvo i istoki neravenstva, Moskva, Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara; Fond Liberal’naya Missiya, 368.
  4. Holmström , Milgrom P., 1991. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, Vol. 7, Special Issue: 24-52.
  5. Hart O., Moore J., 1988. Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica, Vol. 56, №. 4: 755-785.
  6. Taler R., 2015. Novaya povedencheskaya ehkonomika. Pochemu lyudi narushayut pravila tradicionnoj ehkonomiki i kak na ehtom zarabotat’, Moskva, Ehksmo, 550.
  7. Chernetsova N.S., 2003. Ekonomicheskaya priroda i evolyutsiya sistemyi ekonomicheskih interesov: diss. … d-ra ekon. nauk, Moskva, 411.
  8. Rasskazova N.V., 2013. Ustojchivoe razvitie social’no-ehkonomicheskoj sistemy v kontekste teorii interesov. Filosofi- ya hozyajstva, №5: 149-158.
  9. Bazilevich V.D., 2017. Lyudinocentrichnist’ paradigmal’nih zrushen’ v ekonomichnij teorii XXI st. Paradigmal’ni zrushennya v ekonomichnij teorii XXI : Materiali III Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktichnoi konferencii, Ky’yiv, Kii’vs’kij nacional’nij universitet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 15-20.
  10. Tarasevich V.N., 2017. K gnoseologii gosudarstvennogo kapitalizma, Problemi ekonomiki ta politichnoi ekonomii, № 1: 59-82.
  11. Kuz’min O.Ye., O.A. Xiluxa, 2016. Regulyuvannya interesiv stejkxolderiv u korporaty’vnomu upravlinni shlyaxom provedennya korporaty’vny’x peregovoriv. Ekonomichny’j chasopy’s-XXI, № 161: 56-60; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-13
  12. Gry’shhenko A., 2011. Integracijny’j vektor realizaciyi nacional’ny’x ekonomichny’x interesiv Ukrayiny’: teorety’chni ta prakty’chni aspekty’, Mizhnarodna ekonomichna polity’ka, Vy’p. 1-2: 246-274, available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/Mep_2011_1-2_11
  13. Zalevskij G.V., 2005. Fiksirovannye formy ehkonomicheskogo povedeniya v kontekste teorii izbytochnoj ustojchivosti individual’nyh i gruppovyh system, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, №2: 64-68

Download