The article is devoted to the development of the initial theoretical and methodological provisions for the study of profile of modern Ukrainian manager. The results ofthe corresponding applied empirical analysis carried out by the authors are presented. The characteristics of the features of modern Ukrainian manager in the context of existing models of national business cultures are given.

Keywords: manager profile; Ukraine; entrepreneurship; national business culture; characteristics.

Received: 20/01/2018

1st Revision: 15/03/2018

Accepted: 15/05/2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2018/198-3/5

References

1. Hanifan, L. J., 1916. The Rural School Community Center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130­138. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1013498.pdf
2. Bourdieu, P., 1986. The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education / Ed. by J.G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood, p. 241-258.
3. Grishnova, O., Polyv’iana, N., 2009. Social capital: essence, significance, interconnection with other forms of capital. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi, № 3, P. 19-24. [in Ukrainian].
4. Yelahin, V. P., 2011. On the essence of the concept of “social capital” and its role in the process of building a social state. № 1, P. 46-55. [in Ukrainian].
5. Grishnova O., Zaichko O. 2016. Modern Technologies in Labor Economics: New Opportunities and New Challenges. Herald of the Economic Sciences of Ukraine, № 2, pp. 52-56. [in Ukrainian].
6. Kamenska, O., 2016. Conception of management of industrial enterprise human capital is in the conditions of innovative development. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu, № 3(45), P. 225-229 [in Ukrainian].
7. Zaitsev, V., 2017. The choice of the model of corporate requirements to the competence of a specialist of industrial enterprise. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu, № 2(48), P. 207-213. [in Ukrainian].
8. Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Hough, L. M., 1990. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Second edition, vol. 1. – P. 687-732.
9. Bartram, D., Robertson, I. T., Callinen, M., 2002. Competency and individual performance. Modeling the world of work. Organizational Effectiveness: The Role of Psycholog. – Chichester: Wiley, P. 596-618.
10. Glinkowska, B., Kaczmarek, B., 2016. Zarz^dzanie mi^dzynarodowe i internacjonalizacja przedsi^biorstw. Teoria i praktyka. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu todzkiego. todz, 290 s. [in Poland].
11. Kaczmarek, B., 2016. Zarz^dzanie mi^dzykulturowe – wybrane aspekty; B. Glinkowska (red.), Internacjonalizacja przedsi^biorstw. Uwarunkowania, procesy, wyniki badan, todz, S. 87-95. [in Poland].
12. Glinkovska, B., Chebotaryov, V., 2016. Small and medium business in Poland and Ukraine: classification problems and initial institutional framework for transformation / B. Glinkowska (red.), Internacjonalizacja przedsi^biorstw. Uwarunkowania, procesy, wyniki badan, todz, S. 153-164. [in Poland].
13. Nasulea, C., SpTnu, D. F., Moroianu, R. M., 2017. The Polish recipe. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Ekonomika, 3(192), 34-38 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2017/192-3Z7.
14. Watanabe I. (1999). World-Glass management practices Enduring Methods for Competitive Success. Crisp Publications, Inc., 85 p.
15. Trompenaars, F., Woolliams, P., 2003. Business across cultures. West Sussex, England: Capstone Publishing.
16. Hofstede G., 1992. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
17. Lewis R., 2013. Fish Can’t See Water: How National Culture Can Make or Break Your Corporate Strategy, John Wiley & Sons, 312 p.