An Aggregate Examination of the Investment Behaviour

Authors: D.M. Drаghici, ORCID ID 0000000166891705, PhD Student, Faculty of Economic Sciences, “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania

Abstract: As individuals we are egocentric, consistently intending to enhance our self-interests by satisfying our most demanding needs and accomplishing our targets. After assembling all the missing informati on and estimating the probabilities that will ease our directions without being too excessive, the decision is being made. Individuals are perceived to be rational investors. Although the theory is teaching us that we all choose based on calculated possibilities and desired outcomes, the observed conduct disproves it. The aim of this paper is to discern how humans behave, react and invest, with the help of an aggregate research based on historical economic contexts and models. By evaluating as well the strategic conduct in uncertain situations will definitely lead to the identification of some patterns in the decision-making process. Because in the end, humans are being distinguished by their pragmatic way of deciding.

Key words: bounded rationality, ambiguity aversion, adaptive expectations, behavioural biases

Received: 26/07/2018

1st Revision: 20/08/18

Accepted: 10/09/2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2018/201-6/8

References

Akerlof, G.A.: The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3), 488-500 (1970).
Allais, M., Hagen, G.M.: Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox: Contemporary Discussions of the decisions under uncertainty with Allais’ Rejoinder. Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin (2013).
Becker, G.S. The economic way of looking at life. Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic- sciences/laureates/1992/becker-lecture.html (1992), last accessed 2018/03/04.
Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 (4), 643-669 (1961).
Fama, E.F.: Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of finance 25 (2), 383-417 (1970).
Kishtainy, N.: The economics book. DK Pub: New York (2012).
Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W.: John von Neumann’s work in the theory of games and mathematical economics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 64, 100-122 (1958).
Muth, J.F.: Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29 (3), 315-335 (1961). http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1909635
Rolnik, A.J., Weber, W.E.: Gresham’s law or Gresham’s Fallacy? Quarterly Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 10 (1), 17-24 (1986).
Sargent, T.J., Wallace, N.: Rational expectations, the optimal monetary instrument, and the optimal money supply rule.
The Journal of political economy 83 (2), 241-254 (1975).
Simon, H.: Administrative Behaviour. Fourth Edition. Simon and Schuster: New York (2013).
Smith, A.: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. University of Chicago Press: Chicago (1977).
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453-458 (1981).
L. Grigoroi, PhD ORCID iD 0000-0002-0001-5136,

Download