Authors: V. Usyk, ORCID ID 000000020938400X, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Postdoctoral Researcher of the Department of national economy and public administration, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract: Education plays a special role for the development of economy and society. The financing mechanism of educational sector is imperfect and needs to be modernized. The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the content of financial rules in the field of education for effective decision making. One of the most problematic aspect of education is the financial aspect. Recently, there are more and more discussions about the effectiveness of the financial mechanism in the field of education, identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the national financing systems in different countries of the world. One of the tools for improving the financial mechanism in education can be policy rules..Despite constant criticism from various scholars about the underfunding of education, we can say that in Ukraine expenditures on education are adequate, and their share of GDP corresponds to the average for EU countries. Moreover, we agree with those researches who argue that the funding mechanism is not perfect. Today, there is a need to improve the financial mechanism in the field of education, in particular, higher in order to increase its efficiency..In the arsenal of funding models in world practice, there are a lot of quite successful examples and cases that can be used for creating an effective financial system in the field of higher education of Ukraine. In particular, it is worth to establish the rules of the funds’ distribution between the public and private sector, funding sources diversification, models of financial management in education and financial support of those who study (including lending). We are confident that well-formulated financial rules will promote long-term financial stability of the educational sphere and improve the quality of educational services. A substantiated rule in the field of education provides an answer to the question of how the financing indicators of education should change with changing of macroeconomic and other indicators that determine the state of the national economy and society.
Key words: higher education, funding system, Ukraine, financial rules
1st Revision: 15/01/19
Golovni insajty. Pro shho govoryly na Kyi’vs’komu mizhnarodnomu ekonomichnomu forumi 2018?. Retrieved from: https://smartfarming.ua/ua-blog/pro-scho-govorili-na-kmef-2018 [in Ukrainian].
Kharlamova, H., 2017. Brytanska model finansuvannia vyshchoi osvity: uroky dlia Ukrainy. Biuleten Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 194: 58–66. [in Ukrainian]. DOI: ttps://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2017/194-5/9
Prokopenko, I.F., Melnykova, O.V., 2017. Vyshcha osvita yak chynnyk ekonomichnoho zrostannia Ukrainy: suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H. S. Skovorody. Ekonomika, 7: 5–14. [in Ukrainian].
Petrakov, Ja., 2017. Modeli finansuvannja vyshhoi’ osvity v Jevropi ta sviti. Finansy Ukrai’ny, 12: 95–121 [in Ukrainian].
Zatonac’ka, T., 2012. Zarubizhnyj dosvid finansuvannja rozvytku osvity: perspektyvy zastosuvannja v Ukrai’ni. Visnyk Kyi’vs’kogo nacional’nogo universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Ekonomika, 139: 36–39. [in Ukrainian].
Iosif, A.E., 2014. Assessing the impact of innovation on national competitiveness in the European Union. Proceedings of The 24th Annual RESER Conference – Services and new societal challenges: innovation and sustainable growth and welfare Helsinki, Finland, 11th- 13th September. Espoo: VTT: 633-640.
Harashchuk O. 2014. Innovatsiinyi shliakh rozvytku vyshchoi osvity – peredumova pidvyshchennia yii yakosti. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 9: 18-24. [in Ukrainian].
Pavlenko, A. F., & Antonjuk, L. L, & Vasyljkova, N. V., & Iljnycjkyj, D. O. & other, 2014. Doslіdnic’kі unіversiteti: svіtovij dosvіd ta perspektivi rozvitku v Ukraїnі [Research Universities: Global Experience and Development Prospects in Ukraine]. Monograph. K. : KNEU [in Ukrainian].
Cretan, G. C., & Gherghina, R., 2015. Funding higher education in a few EU countries: Implications for competition and competitiveness in higher education. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 5(1): 1–22.
DATA base World bank. Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/
Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Rozdil “Osvita” [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. (n.d.). www.ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publosvita_u.htm. [in Ukrainian].
Statystychni dani. Rozdil “Vydatky”[Statistical data. The section “Expenditures”]. (n.d.) cost.ua. Retrieved from: http://cost.ua/budget/expenditure/.[in Ukrainian].
Statystychni dani Organizacii’ ekonomichnogo spivrobitnyctva ta rozvytku shhodo publichnyh vytrat na osvitu. Retrieved from: https://data.oecd.org/eduresource/public-spending-on-education.htm#indicator-chart
Statystychni dani Organizacii’ ekonomichnogo spivrobitnyctva ta rozvytku shhodo vytrat na vyshhu osvitu. Retrieved from: https://data.oecd.org/eduresource/spending-on-tertiary-education.htm#indicator-chart
Kovalko, N., 2018. Modeli finansuvannja osvity: jaka je dijsno nashoju? Retrieved from:http://edclub.com.ua/blog/modeli- finansuvannya-osvity-yaka-ye-diysno-nashoyu
Shevchenko, L., 2013. Finansuvannja vyshhoi’ osvity: dyversyfikacija dzherel . Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva, 2.
Pruvot Bennetot E., Estermann T., 2017. University Autonomy in Europe III The Scorecard. European University Association. Available at: https://eua.eu/resources/publications/350:university-autonomy%C2%A0in-europe-iii-%C2%A0the-scorecard-2017.html
Higher Education in Australia. A review of reviews from Dawkins to today. Higher Education Funding in Australia, Department of Education and Training, Canberra, 2015. Available at: http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A70703