Authors: O. Nesterenko, ORCID ID 0000000308868173, PhD in Economics, Associate Profesor, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
M. Zdvizova, ORCID ID 0000000318381115, economist, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the place of behavioral approach in the structure of modern economic study. The evolution of views on the essence of economic behavior of individuals is desc ribed and the peculiarities of approaches to its definition of different economic schools are analyzed. The comparative analysis of behavioral and neoclassical approaches is presented; the peculiarity of the used method is the presentation of the neoclassical direction not in the aggregate, but as two main branches – cardinal and ordinal, which allowed for a more detailed analysis. The analysis revealed differences and some similarity of these directions of research. According to the findings, it is concluded that the behavioral approach is not the complete opposite of the neoclassical, but has a significant number of features close to the ideas of ordinary people, so it can be considered as a natural continuation of established ideas deepened through the use of an interdisciplinary approach. The article also outlines possible options for the development of neoclassical and behavioral approaches and the current issues for further research.
Key words: behavioral economics; economic behavior; rationality; individual decision-making process
1st Revision: 10/10/19
Marshall A., 1890. Principles of Economics. 8th ed. London: MacMillan and Co.
Simon H., 1978. Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. American Economic Review, 68(2), pp. 1-16.
Katona G., 1951. Psychological analysis of economic behavior. New York: McGrow-Hill.
Kahneman D., Tversky A., 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2). pp. 263-292.
Binmore K. 2009., Rational Decisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thaler R., Sunstein C., 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin.
Ariely D., 2012. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. 2nd ed. New-York: Harper Collins.
Slukhay S., 2012. Behavioral economic theory as an alternative to the neoclassical paradigm in consumer choice theory. In: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 3rd International Scientific-Practical Conference: Paradigm Shifts in Economic Theory of the 21st Century. Kyiv, Ukraine, 15-16 November 2012. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
Illiashenko P., 2016. Behavioral finance: A historical overview and basics. Bulletin of the National Bank of Ukraine, 239, pp. 30-57.
Dluhopolsky O., Ivashuk Y., 2014. Experimental and behavioral economics: from Vernon Smith to Daniel Kahneman. Bulletin of the Ternopil National Economic University, 1, pp. 180-193.
Ashraf N., Camerer C., Loewenstein G., 2005. Adam Smith, behavioral economist. Journal of Economic Perspectvies, 3 (19). pp. 131-145.
Seligman B., 1962. Main Currents in Modern Economics. Glencoe: Free Press of Glencoe.
Halperin V., Ignatiev S., Morgunov V., 1999. Microeconmics. Saint Petersburg: Economic school.
Belianin A., 2003. Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith: An Economic Analysis of Human Behavior. Issues of Economy, 1, pp. 4-23.
Fletcher N., 2017. chard Thaler wins 2017 Nobel prize in economics – as it happened. The Guardian [online] 1 October. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2017/oct/09/nobel-prize-in-economics-due-to-be-unveiled-business-live [Accessed 20 October 2019].
Chala, Doctor of Sciences in Public Administration, Professor
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy
ORCID ІD 0000-0002-0356-9003