THE INNOVATION-ENTREPRENEURIAL MODELS IN TRANSFER OF ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGIES: TRANSFORMATION OF VALUATIONAL ENTITY AND CONTRADICTIONS OF REALIZATION

Posted on by

Authors: I. Novikova, PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-0440-2616, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract: The evolution of the transformation of the essence of the main innovation-entrepreneurial models in technological transfer is analyzed. It is shown that the emergence of new models of technology transfer is caused by: new forms of competition, changes in public requests and needs, choice of the way of technology implementation, the need to increase revenue, etc. It was found that the modern content of technology transfer models was formed on the basis of previous theories, which directly or indirectly took into account: interests of the research industry, consumer requests and behavior, state priorities and peculiarities of economic relationships between all subjects of the innovation process. Chronological systematization of the main innovative-entrepreneurial models in technology transfer has been carried out. The strengths and weaknesses of the major models of technological transfer are identified, as well as the importance of strategic planning in implementing the process of academic technology transfer. It is proven that modeling in a knowledge-intensive business is able to help solve many common problems that are now encountered in commercial technology transfer. The potential of activating technological transfer in research universities through the lens of the concept of “open” innovations by H. Chesbrough is revealed. The risks and probable conflicts of interest of this concept have been identified. The advantages of the circular model of technology transfer are analyzed. The strategic mistakes made in the science-intensive business are shown.

Keywords: knowledge economy, research university, technology transfer, models of innovative development, linear models of innovative development, model of open innovation, network models of innovative development.

Received: 27/01/2020

1st Revision: 31/01/2020

Accepted: 07/03/2020

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2020/209-2/5

References

  1. Abernathy , Clark K., 1985. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research policy. № 14. P. 3-22.
  2. Gupta S.K, Wilemon D.L., 1990. Accelerating the development of technology-based new products. California Management Review. 32. №.2. P.24-44.
  3. Berkhout , Van Der Duin P., 2007. New ways of innovation: an application of the cyclic innovation model to the mobile telecom industry. International journal of tecnology management.  40. № 4. P. 294–309.
  4. Etzkowitz , Leydesdorff L., 1995. The Triple Helix: University – Industry – Government Relations A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review. Vol. 14. № 1. P.14-19.
  5. Clark R., 1998. Creating Enterpreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transormation. London and New York. International Association of Universities Press and Pergamon-Elsevier Science. 198 p.
  6. Levin , 1993. Technology Transfer as a Learning and Development Process: An Analysis of Norwegian Programs on Technology Transfer. Technovation. № 13(8). Р. 497-518.
  7. Nelson R., Winter S.G., 1977. In search of a useful teory of innovation. Research Policy. № 6. Р. 36-76.
  8. Rothwell (1994).Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review. Vol. 11. № 1. Р. 7-31.
  9. Utterback , Abernathy W., 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. OMEGA, The Int. of Mgmt Sci. Pergamon Press. Printed in Great Britain. Vol. 3. № 6. Р. 639-656.
  10. Чесбро Г., Открытые инновации: создание прибыльных технологий; пер. с англ. В.Н. Егорова. Москва: Поколение, 336 с.
  11. Freeman , 1996. The Greening of Technology and Models of Innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. № 53. Р. 27-39.
  12. Shumpeter A., 2008. Teoryia эkonomycheskoho razvytyia. Kapytalyzm, sotsyalyzm y demokratyia; per. s nem. V.S. Avtonomov, M.S.Liubskyi, A.Iu. Chepurenko. Moskva. 864 s.
  13. Bazhal M., 2003. Znannieva ekonomika: teoriia i derzhavna polityka. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia. № 3. S. 71–86.
  14. Bazylevych D., Ilin V.V., 2008. Intelektualna vlasnist: kreatyvy metafizychnoho poshuku. Kyiv: Znannia. 687 s.
  15. Zhylinska I., 2016. Komplementarni efekty v aktyvizatsii rozvytku naukovo-tekhnichnoi diialnosti v informatsiinomu suspilstvi Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Ekonomika. № 9(186). S.54-60.
  16. Kozachenko Ia., Heorhiadi N.H., 2010. Suchasnyi stan merezh transferu tekhnolohii za kordonom ta problemy yikh rozvytku v Ukraini. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. № 691. S.162–167.
  17. Mrykhina B., 2018. Transfer tekhnolohii z universytetiv u biznes-seredovyshche: paradyhma, kontseptsiia ta instrumentarii otsiniuvannia; M-vo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Nats. un-t “Lvivska politekhnika”. Lviv: Vyd-vo Lviv. Politekhniky. 438 s.
  18. Nykytyn A., Rukas-Pasychniuk V.H., 2015. Modely ynnovatsyonnoho razvytyia y transfera tekhnolohycheskykh ynnovatsyi nauchnukh orhanyzatsyi. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. №3. S.84-89.
  19. Stoliarchuk M., 2018. Evoliutsiia modelei transferu tekhnolohii. Oblik i finansy. № 1. S.176-180.
  20. Abdurakhymova Э.N., Kolesnykova S., Yvashchenko N.P., Tyshchenko E.B., Tyshchenko S.A., 2015. Sovremennыe podkhodы transfera tekhnolohyi y kommertsyalyzatsyy ynnovatsyi. Эkonomycheskye nauky. №6(127). S 49-56.
  21. Ramanathan , 2009. An Overveiw of Tecnology Transfer and Tecnology Transfer Models. Guidebook of technology transfer mechanisms. Business Asia Network, URL: tto.boun.edu.tr
  22. Saidi , 2011. Technology-Push or Market-Pull? A Model for Managing the Innovation Process in Malawian Firms. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy. № 2(4). Р. 33-44.
  23. Carter F., Williams B.R., 1957. Industry and Technical Progress: Factors Governing the Speed of Application of Science, London: Oxford University Press.
  24. Price J., Bass L.W., 1969. Scientific Research and the Innovative Process, Science. № 164, 16 May: 802-816.
  25. Kline , Rosenberg N. “An overview of innovation” in Landau R., Rosenberg N. (eds). 1986. The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology of economic growth – National academy press, Washington. D.C. 640 p.
  26. Bar-Zakay N., 1971. A technology transfer model. Technol. Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 2. Р.321-337.
  27. Halymova P., 2016. Transfer tekhnolohyi: kryteryy vыbora byznes-modely. Upravlenye эkonomykoi: metodы, modely, tekhnolohyy: XVI mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferentsyia; redkoll.: L.A. Ysmahylova (otv. red.) [y dr.]. Ufa. S.42-46.
  28. Innovation Model The Evolution of Innovation Framework Models. URL: https://ipacso.eu/innovation-modelling/innovation- model-analysis.html
  29. Rothwell’s five generations of innovation URL: http://innovatorium.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/rothwens-five-generation
  30. Souder E., 1989. Improving Productivity Through Technology Push. Research Technology Management. № 6(4). Р. 305-306.
  31. Wahab , Rose R., Jegak U., Abdullah H., 2009. A Review on the Technology Transfer Models, Knowledge-Based and Organizational Learning Models on Technology Transfer. European Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 10. № 4. Р. 550-564.
  32. Aguzzi , 2019. ‘Broken access’ publishing corrodes quality. Nature. № 570. Р. 139. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01787-2
  33. Frents , Lambert R., 2008. Otkrutue y zakrutue ynnovatsyy: sravnytelnui analyz natsyonalnukh praktyk. Forsait. № 3(7). S.16-31.
  34. Francisco Velasco OPINIÓN Re-thinking Technology URL: https://kimglobal.com/en/noticia/opinion-%C2%B7-re-thinking- technology-transfer/
  35. Chmyr S., 2016. Ohliad naukovykh pidkhodiv do vyznachennia suti ta modelei innovatsiinoi diialnosti i transferu tekhnolohii. Kyiv. 119 s.
  36. Bradley ,  C. Hayter,  Link  A.,  2013.  Models  and  methods  of  university  technology  transfer.  Foundations  and  Trends  in Entrepreneurship, №9 (6). Р. 571-650.

Download