Authors: O. Cheberyako, Dr of Historical Science, PhD in Economics, Prof., ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1563-9611, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine; V. Bykova, Junior Auditor, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2401-8892, PJSC KPMG Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine
Annotation: The article substantiates the nature of the national models of the pension system and its structure in accordance with the concept of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The basis of the national models of pension system are two well-known models of social security: Bismarck and Beveridge Social Insurance Systems. Thus, authors prepared the comparison of this models. The features of pension system in the countries of Europe (Germany, Great Britain, Sweden, Poland), the United States and Chile are analysed. The analysis of the national models of the pension system in Asian countries identifies three institutional patterns: the statist pension system (Taiwan and China), the dualist pension system (Japan and Korea) and individualist pension system (Hong Kong and Singapore). Based on trends of development of pension provision in foreign countries, authors determine the main tasks and ways to improve the domestic system, namely, introduction mandatory funded pension system and reforming the voluntary private pensions insurance.
Key words: models of the pension system, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), distribution pension system, funded pension system, voluntary private pensions.
Recei ved: 14/09/ 2020
1st Revision: 28/ 09/2020
Accepted: 27/10/ 2020
1. Buriachenko O.E., 2017. The pension system in Ukraine: the history of formation and theoretical foundations of development at the present stage of nation-building [Ph.D. dissertation], Odessa. 252 p.
2. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 [online]. Available at:https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015
3. Kozak H.I., 2018. Non-state pension funds in the context of reforming the pension system of Ukraine [Ph.D. dissertation], Ternopil.225 p.
4. Accumulative pension insurance: the Poland experience, 2018. Financial and economic analysis office in the VRU [online]. Available at: https://feao.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/polandpension.pdf
5. Libanova E., 2010. Pension reform in Ukraine: directions of implementation. 270 p.
6. Petrushka O.V, Sydor I.P., 2019. Distributive and accumulative pension systems: Asian experience and conclusions for Ukraine. Infrastruktura Rynku, No35.p 405-410. https://doi.org/10.32843/infrastruct35-64
7. Act No. 1058-IV of 9 July 2003 on compulsory State pension insurance[online]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1058-15#Text
8. ProkopenkoV.Yu., Mishchenko V.S., 2018. Pension provision: domestic practice and foreign experience Visnyk KhNAU Ekonomichni Nauky, No4. p. 418-427. DOI: 10.31359/2312-3427-2018-4-418
9. Cheberyako O.V., Bykova V.O., 2019. Solidarity pension system in Ukraine: current state, problems and prospects of development. Modernizatsiia derzhavnykh finansiv Ukrainy v kontekstiy evropeiskoho vyboru [monohrafiia]. 312 p.
10. Cheberyako O.V., Bykova V.O., 2019. Financial stability of the solidarity pension system in Ukraine. Formuvannia rynkovoi ekonomiky v Ukraini, No 41 [online]. Available at:http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/collections/index.php/economics/article/view/2866
11. Cheberyako O.V., Lozova H.M., 2017.Models of pension provision and reform of the pension system in Ukraine. National economik development and modernization: expirience of Poland and prospects for Ukraine, volume 1.p.253-272
12. Chernyavska O.V., Horbunova O.A., 2013. Classification of national pension’s models: international experience and local practice. Ekonomika ta derzhava, No2. p. 38-44
13. Anke Hassel, Marek Naczyk& Tobias Wib, 2019. The political economy of pension financialisation: public policy responses to the crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, volume 26. pp. 483-500https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1575455
14. Auerbach, Alan J., Lee, Ronald, 2011. Welfare and generational equity in sustainable unfunded pension systems. Journal of Public Economics, volume 95 (1-2). p.16-27.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.008
15. Bismarck versus Beveridge: A Comparison of Social Insurance Systems in Europe: Database for Institutional Comparisonsin Europe (DICE Database), 2008. The CES ifo Group [online]. Available at: https://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/dicereport408-db6.pdf.
16. Chung-Yang Yeh, Hyunwook Cheng, Shih-Jiunn Shi, 2020. Public–private pension mixes in East Asia: institutional diversity and policy implications for old-age security. Ageing & Society, volume 40.p.604 – 625.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001137
17. German Pension System by Jürgen Fodor, 2018. [online]. Available at: https://www.actuaries.org/IAA/Documents/CMTE_SSC/Meetings/Berlin_2018/Minutes/4_German_Pension_System.pdf
18. OECD Private Pension. Outlook 2008, 2009 [online]. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/pensions/private-pensions/42169565.pdf
19. Pension at a Glance 2019: OECD and G20 Indicators, 2019 [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/b6d3dcfc-en.
20. Karel Lannoo, Mikkel Barslund, Ales Chmelar, Martenvon Werder, 2014.Pensions Schemes: Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy [online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/536281/IPOL_STU(2014)536281_EN.pdf
21. Retirement Anxiety of Informal Workers: A View on the Chilean Pension System, 2018 [online]. Available at: https://icpm.in1touch.org/document/5309/REQUIRED-Case-Study-Chile-Retirement-FINAL_.pdf.
22. The Swedishold-age pension system, 2016.Government Offices of Sweden. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs [online]. Available at: https://www.government.se/49aff8/contentassets/f48ac850ff0f4ed4be065ac3b0bcab15/the-swedish-old-age-pension-system_webb.pdf