С Бурнете, канд. экон. наук, проф. Университет имени Лучиана Блага, Сибиу, Румыния ТРАНСАТЛАНТИЧЕСКАЯ ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ: ВАЖНЫЙ ПРЫЖОК К ГЛОБАЛИЗОВАННОМУ МИРУ

Рассматривается предстоящая трансатлантическая экономическая интеграция через призму как экономической теории, так и исторического развития. Утверждается, что на трансконтинентальном уровне экономическая интеграция не менее прибыльна, чем на региональном уровне. Использованы теоретические и исторические аргументы, чтобы подчеркнуть необходимость и возмож­ность заключения торгового и инвестиционного соглашения между Соединенными Штатами и Европейским Союзом, которое, веро­ятно, превратит Атлантику в могучий экономический полюс. Показано, что Европа и Америка полны готовности к заключению это­го важнейшего соглашения.

Ключевые слова: трансатлантическая интеграция, международная торговля, региональные блоки, инвестиции, партнерство.

Received: 31/01/2018

1st Revision: 10/04/18

Accepted: 20/05/18

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2018/198-3/3

References

  1. Aguilar, Linda M. NAFTA: A Review of the Issues. In Philip Kinge (Ed.) International Economics and International Economic Policy, McGraw-Hill Inc., 1995, pp. 183-187.
  2. Almeida, P. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the U.S. semi-conductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 1996, 155-165.
  3. Bhagwati, J. Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview. In Bhagwati, P. Krishna, & A. Panagariya (Eds.), Trading blocs: alternative approaches to analyzing preferential trade agreements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
  4. Bouzas, R. The ‘new regionalism’ and the Free Trade Area of the Americas: a less benevolent view. Cepal Review, 85, 2005.
  5. Bull, H. The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics (Vol. 2nd edn). Basingstoke and London: Macmillan, 1995.
  6. Cantwell, J. & Harding, R. The internationalization of German companies R&D. International Investment and Management, National Institute Economic Review, 1997, 163/1.
  7. Cooper, W. EU-US Economic Ties: Framework, Scope, and Magnitude, Congressional Research Service, 2009.
  8. Ducros, , Viner J. The Customs Union Issue, Notes bibliographiques, Revue économique, année 1951, Vol. 2 (6), pp. 801-802. Available at: http://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1951_num_2_6_406878_t1_0801_0000_001
  9. Erixon, F. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, CESifo Forum nr. 4, 2013. Available at: http://www.ecipe.org/ app/uploads/2014/12/TTIP_and_the_Shifting_Structure_of_Trade_Policy.pdf
  10. Fisman, , Paravisini, D. & Vig, V. Cultural proximity and loan outcomes. American Economic Review, 2017, 107(2), 457-492.
  11. Gnesotto, N. Reshaping EU-US Relations. A concept paper. Notre Europe (Studies and Research 75), 2010.
  12. Egan, M., Cowles, M. The Evolution of the Transatlantic Partnership. Transworld Working Paper, 5, 2012.
  13. Hosny, A. S. Theories of Economic Integration: A Survey of the Economic and Political Literature, International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, Vol. 2 (5), 2013, pp. 133-155, http://www.waprogramming.com/papers/5157de7c463eb9.70128490.pdf
  14. Keohane, R. After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
  15. Keohane, R. Ironies of Sovereignty: The European Union and the United States. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 2002, 743-765, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00396
  16. Krugman, P. The Move Toward Free Trade Zones, In Philip Kinge (Ed.) International Economics and International Economic Policy, McGraw-Hill Inc., 1995, pp. 163-182.
  17. Kuemmerle, W. The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999, Vol.30/1, pp. 1-24.
  18. Lamy, Stepping Stones or Stumbling Blocks? The EU’s Approach Towards the Problem of Multilateralism vs Regionalism in Trade Policy. The World Economy, 25(10), 2002, 1399-1413.
  19. Lipsey, R. The Theory of Customs Unions: A General Survey, In J. Bhagwati (Ed.), International Trade: Selected Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.
  20. Manners, I. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 20(2), 2000, 235-258, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00353
  21. Meunier, What single voice? European institutions and EU-US trade negotiations. International Organization, 2000, 54(1), 103-120.
  22. Meunier, Trading Voices. The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
  23. Meunier, , Kalypso, N. The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy, 2006, 13(6), 906-925.
  24. Müftüler, B., Cihangir, D. The Transatlantic Relationship and the future Global Governance, Transworld, Oct., 2014.
  25. Panagariya, A., Findlay, R. A Political Economy Analysis of Free-Trade Areas and Customs Unions, In R.C. Feenstra, G.M. Grossman and D.A. Irwin (Eds.), The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1996, pp. 265-287.
  26. Pollack, M. The Political Economy of the Transatlantic Partnership, Roberty Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, 2003.
  27. Sampson, , & Woolcock, S. Regionalism, Multilateralism and Economic Integration:The recent experience. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 2003.
  28. Schwok, R.U.S. – EU Relations: Drifting Apart? Dissociative and Associative Approaches Ever Closer Parnership. Policy-Making in US-EU Relations, pp. 363-385. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press/Peter Lang, 2001.
  29. Smith, M. A liberal Grand Strategy in a realist world? Power, purpose and the EU’s changing global role. Journal of European Public Policy, 2010, 18(2), 144-163.
  30. Tsoukalis, L. The New European Economy Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
  31. Woolcock, S. The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision Making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.

Загрузить

  • pdf 198_34-39
    Размер файла: 399 kB Кол-во скачиваний: 73