В статті проаналізовано ключові компоненти системи державного управління заснованої на принципі формуванні стійкого зростання національної економіки. Виокремлено показники успішності впровадження даної моделі. Визначено ряд найбільш ефективних заходів щодо антикризового регулювання та створення підвалин до стійкого зростання економіки України.
Ключові слова: Світова фінансово-економічна криза, антикризове управління, модель стійкого зростання.
Надійшла до редколегії 22.10.16
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2016/188-11/1
References
- Golub J. (2008) The Study of Decision-Making Speed in the European Union Methods, Data and Theory, European Union Politics, Volume 9 (1), pp. 167-179.
- Mazur B. (2010) Cultural Diversity in Organizational Theory and Practice, Bialystok Technical University, Journal of Intercultural Management, Volume 2 (2), pp. 5-15.
- Chalekian P. (2013) POSDCORB: Core Patterns of Administration, MD, USA: PLoP, 20 p.
- Karpova V. (2010) National idea of modern Ukraine: problems and prospects of foundation, Bulletin of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, № 3, pp. 21-29.
- Chupriy L. (2012) National idea as a factor in the consolidation of Ukrainian political nation, Scientific notes of the
- Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies, Volume 2, pp. 230-244.
- Tolbert P. and Zucker L. (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, Administrative Science Quarterly, № 28, pp. 20-39.
- Law of Ukraine “On the state service”, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, law № 889 – VIII, 10.12.2015, available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/889-19
- Sharma M. and Jain S. (2013) Leadership Management: Principles, Models and Theories, Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, Volume 3 (3), pp. 309-318.
- Isac C., Voichi{a L., Gu[a A. (2009) Coordination of management activities – a condition sine qua non of a performance management, Annals of the University of Petrosani. Economics, Volume 9 (3), pp. 335-340.
- Eaton K., Kaiser K., Smoke P. (2010) The political economy of decentralization reforms: implications for aid effectiveness, Washington, D.C., USA: The World Bank, 92 p.
- Castelli J. (2007) Government Public Relations: A Quantitative Assessment of Government Public Relations Practitioner Roles and Public Relations Model Usage, FL, USA: University of South Florida, 120p.
- Briatko A.A. (2014) Research methodology of financial and economic oscillations: general characteristics and vision features of certain scientists, Bulletin of the I.I. Mechnikov Odessa National University. Economics, Volume 19 (3), pp.212-218.
- Cheberyako O., Ryabokon O. (2016) Local budgets under current decentralization: Ukraine and foreign experience, Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, № 4 (181), pp .24-29, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2016/181-4/4
- Briatko A.A. (2016) Anti-crisis policy of the European post-soviet countries: common characteristics and national features, Bulletin of the Mariupol State University. Economics, Volume 11, pp.92-102.
- Briatko A.A. (2016) World financial and economic crisis and BRIKS countries reaction on it, Bulletin of the V.O. Sukhomlinskiy National University. Economics, № 1 (6), pp.74-87.